Up the Yangtze with 28mm Figures
I
have never seen (or read) Sand Pebbles,
but I have a bit of an obsession with gaming with sailor/marine forces, so when
I saw the post of TMP about Tiger
Miniatures new ‘Sand Pebbles’ range of figures I had to order some.
I
was pleased with the figures when they arrived. There was a minimum of flash on
them and they are well detailed with a nice variety of poses and weapons. They
are on the heroic side of 28mm in terms of size, but that just brings them in
line with ranges like Pulp Figures and Copplestone.
The
faces of the figures are all nicely animated, although some border on
cartoonish. The only concern I have with the figures is the hands – which on
most of the figures are ridiculously large. It’s particularly striking when you
are painting them, but fortunately it is not especially noticeable at a
distance on the gaming table. From reading on-line reviews of Tiger Figures I
get a sense that this new range is probably a cut-above their previous offerings
and I would definitely recommend them. I understand there are plans to add more
figures to the range, but Tiger advise that the timeframe is currently unknown.
While
I was impressed with the Tiger figures I was concerned that the range lacked fire-power,
so I went searching for some suitable support weapons. To my surprise I found
there is a second maker of 28mm Sand Pebbles figures (who would have guessed!).
The Australian company Blaze
Away Miniatures makes a US Shore Party Range that includes a two man navy Lewis
gun team – so I ordered two.
When
these figures arrived I was pleasantly surprised to find a couple of extra figures
included to make up for the ‘delay’ in postage (I can’t say I had noticed – but
full marks for customer service). It’s hard not to be impressed by these
figures. They had with very little flash and are finely detailed with things
like laces on the gators, buttons on pouches and wrinkles on faces all clearly visible.
The figures are closer to true 28mm in height and thinner than the Tiger
figures, but not so much that they look odd together on the same table
(although you wouldn’t put them on the same base). They are also nicely proportioned. My only
concern is that they all seem to have been cast in an odd legs apart stance
which gives them a slightly unnatural look. Despite this issue, these are still
very nice figures and I would definitely recommend them. They are a quality alternative
to the Tiger range, although be warned the website images don’t do justice to
the figures.
PIC:
Figures left to right; TM, TM,TM, BZ, BZ, Z
Peter
West
Guest
Contributor
No comments:
Post a Comment